
Shook & Stone increased an insurance company’s initial $24,780 offer to a $37,499 final bodily injury settlement by attorney-led negotiation and evidence-driven demands. The case underscores the value of direct attorney access and active litigation posture—even when insurers attempt to undervalue legitimate injury claims.
The Narrative
Problem: Undervalued Claim and Early Lowball Offer
Our client was injured in a Las Vegas motor vehicle collision caused by another driver’s negligence. Despite clear liability and documented medical treatment, State Farm initially attempted to resolve the claim for just $24,780, an amount that failed to account for the full scope of medical expenses, future care needs, and quality-of-life impact .
Like many injury victims, the client faced pressure to accept an early offer before the long-term consequences of the injuries were fully understood.
Action: Attorney-Led Negotiation with Direct Client Access
Shook & Stone rejected the initial offer and took control of the claim. Our attorneys:
- Prepared and submitted a comprehensive tort demand package
- Documented medical specials, future treatment projections, and functional limitations
- Leveraged clear liability and damages evidence to push the carrier off its low valuation
- Maintained direct attorney access, ensuring the client could speak with counsel whenever needed
This was not a volume-driven settlement—it was hands-on legal advocacy.
Result: $37,499 Final Settlement
Following sustained negotiation, State Farm issued a final bodily injury payment of $38,499, representing a significant increase over the original offer and delivering fair compensation for the injuries sustained .
Just as important, the client remained informed and supported throughout the process.
Client Review – Direct Attorney Access
“If I ever needed anything I had direct access to my attorney. It can’t get better than that!”
This review highlights a core Shook & Stone differentiator: clients are not passed off or walled off from their lawyer—especially when critical settlement decisions are on the